|
Post by The Darkness on May 15, 2008 16:33:43 GMT -5
(Offtopic from the last 2 posts)
I voted no. Jamie Lloyd never wanted to kill, period. The only reason she murdered her foster mom was because Michael controlled her due to a telepthic link they shared. For her to willingly begin slashing would make no sense in my eyes.
|
|
|
Post by Xч on May 16, 2008 19:03:58 GMT -5
This is how i could have seen Jamie after she broke out the Mental Institution according to my idea..
The picture was taken of the killer in the Movie Shredder.
She was a great psycho killer in Shredder. So I'm pretty positive a Jamie the killer storyline would have worked in Halloween part 5.
Basically Jamie would have looked like the girl in the pic just with slight modifications.
Jamie had black hair.
Maybe if there was like another 5 year gap between 4 and 5 and somehow there were 2 killers in part 5, it could have worked for a moment.
Has anybody else noticed the face in the tree in the above picture with Michael walking by it?
Did you put it there Demon, or am I crazy?
It's right over Michaels shoulder between it and his nose.
You guys see it? Its the same tree they used In Friday part 6. You know during that crazy death scene. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Chainsaw on May 16, 2008 23:42:31 GMT -5
Maybe if there was like another 5 year gap between 4 and 5 and somehow there were 2 killers in part 5, it could have worked for a moment.
Its the same tree they used In Friday part 6. You know during that crazy death scene. ;D Ya, I never thought of it like that,I think you're right. ;D
Honestly, the best outcome for Jamie in part 4 would have been death. That would have sealed the deal for me and made a decent movie great. Just my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by jlaw on May 16, 2008 23:48:14 GMT -5
(Offtopic from the last 2 posts) I voted no. Jamie Lloyd never wanted to kill, period. The only reason she murdered her foster mom was because Michael controlled her due to a telepthic link they shared. For her to willingly begin slashing would make no sense in my eyes. I don't know man. If we're looking at just Part 4, when we saw Jaime touch/hold Michael's hand at the end, I see it simply as the evil being passed on. Even as a kid I thought that, until watching Part 5 immediately afterwards. If we're looking at what just Part 4 presented, I don't think she was being controlled by Michael at all, she had the evil force that possessed Michael perhaps, take a hold of her.
|
|
|
Post by Xч on May 17, 2008 6:07:32 GMT -5
(Offtopic from the last 2 posts) I voted no. Jamie Lloyd never wanted to kill, period. The only reason she murdered her foster mom was because Michael controlled her due to a telepthic link they shared. For her to willingly begin slashing would make no sense in my eyes. I don't know man. If we're looking at just Part 4, when we saw Jaime touch/hold Michael's hand at the end, I see it simply as the evil being passed on. Even as a kid I thought that, until watching Part 5 immediately afterwards. If we're looking at what just Part 4 presented, I don't think she was being controlled by Michael at all, she had the evil force that possessed Michael perhaps, take a hold of her.
I always saw it that way as well.
Its the same tree they used In Friday part 6. You know during that crazy death scene. ;D Ya, I never thought of it like that,I think you're right. ;D
Honestly, the best outcome for Jamie in part 4 would have been death. That would have sealed the deal for me and made a decent movie great. Just my opinion.
Thats cool Chainsaw,my Jamie idea was just my opinion too. Jamie dies in H6 so i can definitely see her dieing in part 4's ending. Would have been heart breaking to see that innocent little girl die though.
|
|
|
Post by Chainsaw on May 17, 2008 12:11:39 GMT -5
Ya, I never thought of it like that,I think you're right. ;D
Honestly, the best outcome for Jamie in part 4 would have been death. That would have sealed the deal for me and made a decent movie great. Just my opinion.
Thats cool Chainsaw,my Jamie idea was just my opinion too. Jamie dies in H6 so i can definatly see her dieng in part 4's ending. Would have been heart breaking to see that innocent little girl die though. Yep, I like my horror heartbreaking and to whenever possible go against the grain. ANytime noone survives or a child or the lead hero/heroine dies, it's a quality movie IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Xч on May 17, 2008 13:12:24 GMT -5
#2n67qio#
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Dec 2, 2008 20:50:35 GMT -5
If Jamie had been the killer, the general audience would have been confused and alienated and done just what they did with H3, demanding more Michael.
The same would have happened if Tommy replaced Jason as the killer.
|
|