|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Oct 27, 2010 16:24:32 GMT -5
That is the official title of Nolan's third Batman movie and he has confirmed that the Riddler won't appear in it.
It also won't be shot in 3D.
|
|
|
Post by Leatherface on Oct 27, 2010 16:29:25 GMT -5
Killer croc is going to be the villain
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Oct 27, 2010 16:32:19 GMT -5
Has Nolan confirmed that yet?
Tom Hardy, who starred in Nolan's Inception, has a major role in the movie.
|
|
|
Post by Leatherface on Oct 27, 2010 16:34:44 GMT -5
Yeah. I forget the article but he said he wanted to use Killer Croc
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Oct 27, 2010 16:40:10 GMT -5
As long as he doesn't use the Penguin, I am fine, and of course he won't be using Two Face or The Joker.
|
|
|
Post by Leatherface on Oct 27, 2010 16:43:34 GMT -5
Yeah he is going off the less animalistic version of Croc and more of the skin desaed version, like in the animated series. He said he wasn't gonna do penguin at all and same with Joker. Though I'm still kinda hoping for Scarecrow but I know he isn't gonna appear....
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Oct 27, 2010 16:50:53 GMT -5
I just hope that this one avoids the curse of three, which happens to most franchises (eg. Spider-Man 3).
|
|
|
Post by Leatherface on Oct 27, 2010 17:10:45 GMT -5
I don't think it will. Nolan is a very smart director, he and David S Goyer are writing this one like they did with the first two.
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Oct 27, 2010 18:30:18 GMT -5
Yeah, if anyone can break the curse, it is Nolan.
The man simply has a golden touch these days.
|
|
|
Post by Rebel on Oct 27, 2010 18:35:05 GMT -5
Hmm. I may be getting Dark Knight soon as I have enough on my Amazon free gift card of $7.59 as I could get a free used cheap copy. Either that or Spiderman 3.
I hope I am not bored to death and near suicide like I was with Batman Begins. Talk about massive boredom. I tried sober and drunk on that one.
I guess I can only hope for the best on this new one.
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Oct 27, 2010 18:48:48 GMT -5
Why bother getting Spidey 3?
There is a reason why it is the best example of the curse of three.
|
|
|
Post by Rebel on Oct 27, 2010 18:51:49 GMT -5
For the sake of havign them all. Unless its on a pay per view I get three free from Direct TV I could always do that ;D
|
|
|
Post by Doomsday on Oct 28, 2010 1:17:33 GMT -5
should have gone with Gotham as the title of the movie, The Dark Knight Rises is lame, and it seems a lot of ppl feel the same way
don't be surprised if the main villian is female, they've been on the lookout for a while now for a lead female role
|
|
|
Post by The Darkness on Oct 28, 2010 16:04:39 GMT -5
That is a very ugly movie title. lol
|
|
|
Post by ÇŢ™ on Oct 28, 2010 19:09:56 GMT -5
I can't wait! This and Ghostbusters 3! ;D
And Rebel, The Dark Knight is 20x better than Spiderman 3!!!!
|
|
|
Post by The Darkness on Oct 28, 2010 20:08:59 GMT -5
Spider-Man 3, compared to the other two, was HORRENDOUS. I can't believe it was the same director!
|
|
|
Post by Leatherface on Oct 28, 2010 21:23:42 GMT -5
Blame Sony, they screwed with Rami from the get-go.
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Oct 28, 2010 21:42:01 GMT -5
Yeah, they forced him to use two villains, and he wasn't a fan of Venom in the first place.
No wonder they are rebooting the franchise already.
|
|
|
Post by Leatherface on Oct 28, 2010 22:54:59 GMT -5
Not only that he wanted Gwen Stacy to be the love intrest in 1 but they wanted Mary Jane.
|
|
|
Post by JasonKrueger13 on Oct 29, 2010 0:14:53 GMT -5
They are rebooting because Raimi needed more than the time they gave him to deliver a quality title. Also, they still didn't give him complete control...AGAIN!!!
On topic: The title seems weak and The Riddler would be amazing in Nolen's world.
|
|