|
Post by FireStar on May 16, 2009 20:43:33 GMT -5
Yeah those trailers their showing aren't showing much at all, are they?
|
|
|
Post by JasonKrueger13 on May 17, 2009 0:25:12 GMT -5
Arnold's face is a T-600 put only appears for 3 seconds, it is on one of the trailers. There has been extremely positive word of mouth from the premiere which means that McG pulled it off. 1 more week!!!!
|
|
|
Post by FireStar on May 17, 2009 0:50:30 GMT -5
I must'vemissed that trailer the ones I've seen don't show him at all. At least the word is positive.
|
|
|
Post by The Darkness on May 17, 2009 7:25:43 GMT -5
I'll probably see this. I've always enjoyed the Terminator films, maybe the first two a bit more than the third, but I find them very intriging and entertaining. I'm confused with this one though. Is this a prequel or a sequel?
|
|
|
Post by Doomsday on May 17, 2009 12:50:46 GMT -5
this one takes place about 10 years after the 3rd one if I'm not mistaken, give or take a few years
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on May 17, 2009 13:54:33 GMT -5
Arnold's face is a T-600 put only appears for 3 seconds, it is on one of the trailers. There has been extremely positive word of mouth from the premiere which means that McG pulled it off. 1 more week!!!! What trailer is that? Can you post it?
|
|
|
Post by JasonKrueger13 on May 18, 2009 6:34:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by FireStar on May 18, 2009 20:12:22 GMT -5
Yep that's Arnold alright. Cool.
|
|
|
Post by JasonKrueger13 on May 19, 2009 9:16:36 GMT -5
CGI face, even if he was in shape, he is the Governor of California. Ok so Arnold (His face at least) i one of the first T-800's, not a T-600.
|
|
|
Post by FireStar on May 19, 2009 19:59:42 GMT -5
At least he's in it in some form, it just wouldn't feel right seeing a Terminator film without him in it at all.
|
|
|
Post by Boggman! on May 20, 2009 13:23:36 GMT -5
A friend of mine saw it last night at an early screening and said it is AMAZING!
|
|
|
Post by FireStar on May 20, 2009 20:47:54 GMT -5
I'm hoping to see it before the weekend's out. It really looks like a blast.
|
|
|
Post by JasonKrueger13 on May 21, 2009 8:56:58 GMT -5
I saw it at midnight and everyone cheered for the Arnold cameo. Worthington was the best thing about the movie and I feel that this is a great installment in the Terminator series!
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on May 21, 2009 14:54:40 GMT -5
That body under Arnold is so fake hahaha That wasn't e3vn close to what Arnolds body looked like
Like FS said though it wouldnt be a Trem without his face in it.
I am going to see it in 1 hour. I will let you know my dumb ass opinion.
|
|
|
Post by JasonKrueger13 on May 21, 2009 15:31:24 GMT -5
That body under Arnold is so fake hahaha That wasn't e3vn close to what Arnolds body looked like
Like FS said though it wouldnt be a Trem without his face in it.
I am going to see it in 1 hour. I will let you know my dumb ass opinion. I thought the body looked liked Arnold in the mid 80s. The body double even played as Arnold in a bio film, lol. Still Arnold is in the film is some way which makes it a Terminator film!!! Hope you enjoy it one way or another.
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on May 21, 2009 19:38:32 GMT -5
No one can just get the polish Arnold put on his body. That's why he was the greatest body builder who ever lived. The body they used and in the bio you spoke of is inaccurate. Arnold had almost no fat between his skin and muscle. This body has the size almost perfectly. Yet the bone structure is slightly off as well.
Anyway for the movie...
I will put it in a rating you can get an idea for. Star Trek was a 10 or higher. Wolverine was a 6, prolly the most disappointing movie of the "summer". This is somewhere in the middle.
The greatest parts were the action scenes. I know I sound like a mindless seal who claps for action but hear me out. The action was intense and incredible. Worthington was by far a more entertaining character than Bale BTW. I think what this movie did that made it imperfect was 2 diff things.
They took a B storyline and made it the A focus for far too long. It was almost as if (in an odd way) the war against SkyNet was secondary. Although it never truly was...
The attacks from SkyNet were all perfect until the end. The Arnold T-800 was by far the greatest thing to happen to the last 1/3 of the movie. By the time John Conner had the movies final sequence against skynet it was far too easy. It was far fetched and unrealistic. Yes... even though you have to believe the entire premise this ON TOP OF THAT was too go lucky to be believable.
They had a lot of that a million bullets fired at you but all miss somehow deal going too.
What took place between skynet and Worthington was completely out of character for skynet. They completely humanized it and took all of the fear right out of you. They gave skynet a personality for Christ's sakes. WTF?
Yet the action scenes were all very good and very realistic in the first 2/3 of the movie.
So I rate it an 8.
|
|
|
Post by FireStar on May 21, 2009 20:23:42 GMT -5
That's not too bad, was it better than Rise of the Machines? That one just gets under mt skin at times.
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on May 21, 2009 20:55:39 GMT -5
The actors and writing for Arnold killed that movie. Otherwise that movie was good. But there's not much else besides those too bad things lol
|
|
|
Post by JasonKrueger13 on May 22, 2009 5:38:11 GMT -5
I agree with Worthington, I guess that makes 2 films Bale got out shined by the supporting cast, but he was a ok John Conner. Anton Yelchin as the teenage Kyle Reese did a great job, at some points, he looked exactly like what Michael Bhein would look at that age.
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on May 22, 2009 17:56:24 GMT -5
They should REALLY take advantage of the CGI Arnold in the next Term movie. It's prolly the ONLY movies that can use it effectively. They can make hundreds of them and none of them have to talk... perfect. Any other movie putting Arnolds face in would mostly likely have to make him talk to be effective and that just wouldn't work.
|
|