|
Post by SiMpLe-SiStEr on Jul 26, 2006 1:20:33 GMT -5
Can some one tell me who won the fight between Ortiz or Shamrock? I can't find out anywhere. :wah:
|
|
|
Post by Colt .45 on Jul 26, 2006 1:22:17 GMT -5
I think it was Ken, But im not sure.
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jul 26, 2006 1:26:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jul 26, 2006 13:31:32 GMT -5
Shamrock wasn't even knocked out.
He stood right back up.
It was a bad call.
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jul 26, 2006 13:56:58 GMT -5
Shamrock wasn't even knocked out. He stood right back up. It was a bad call. How does a tko work in the UFC. In boxing it's when you knock the opponent to the mat 3 times right? So what constitutes a tko in UFC?
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jul 26, 2006 16:26:09 GMT -5
I am not totally sure.
I don't really follow UFC, but from what I have heard, it wasn't even close to a TKO.
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jul 26, 2006 16:40:48 GMT -5
I am not totally sure. I don't really follow UFC, but from what I have heard, it wasn't even close to a TKO. I have a feeling even if it was a bad call the end result would have been the same. From what I've heard the last time they fought Ortiz destroyed him.
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jul 26, 2006 16:43:45 GMT -5
I am not totally sure. I don't really follow UFC, but from what I have heard, it wasn't even close to a TKO. I have a feeling even if it was a bad call the end result would have been the same. From what I've heard the last time they fought Ortiz destroyed him. There will be a part three to this for sure.
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jul 26, 2006 16:45:44 GMT -5
No doubt. There's too much money to be made from it.
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jul 26, 2006 16:49:43 GMT -5
A lot of people wh0 paid good money to see the fight were mad because they felt that they were ripped off.
Overall, the card was said to be disappointing.
|
|
|
Post by SiMpLe-SiStEr on Jul 26, 2006 21:58:46 GMT -5
Thanks. I don't understand how they judge those fights. Hubby wanted to know who won real bad. We weren't about to pay a bunch of money to see a fight that was gonna last but a couple minutes. From what ya'll saying, it lasted under 2 minutes?
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jul 26, 2006 22:14:28 GMT -5
Thanks. I don't understand how they judge those fights. Hubby wanted to know who won real bad. We weren't about to pay a bunch of money to see a fight that was gonna last but a couple minutes. From what ya'll saying, it lasted under 2 minutes? Not even a minute and a half. It lasted 78 seconds.
|
|
|
Post by Stinger on Jul 31, 2006 6:44:56 GMT -5
I bought this pay-per-view from somebody online but haven't had the chance to watch it yet. It was so disappointing to hear that Shamrock/Ortiz match was so short since they hyped it up so much. I really wanted to see the two of them go at it. I just couldn't see Shamrock winning either way though.
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jul 31, 2006 13:41:12 GMT -5
Personally, I find UFC to be a little dull.
Same goes for boxing.
|
|
|
Post by SiMpLe-SiStEr on Jul 31, 2006 14:46:49 GMT -5
I bought this pay-per-view from somebody online but haven't had the chance to watch it yet. It was so disappointing to hear that Shamrock/Ortiz match was so short since they hyped it up so much. I really wanted to see the two of them go at it. I just couldn't see Shamrock winning either way though. Gee, glad we didn't bother with the pay per view if it only lasted a minute and a half. That Shamrock boosting how bad a**ed he was and he's the one who's butt was kicked?
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jul 31, 2006 17:59:16 GMT -5
I bought this pay-per-view from somebody online but haven't had the chance to watch it yet. It was so disappointing to hear that Shamrock/Ortiz match was so short since they hyped it up so much. I really wanted to see the two of them go at it. I just couldn't see Shamrock winning either way though. Gee, glad we didn't bother with the pay per view if it only lasted a minute and a half. That Shamrock boosting how bad a**ed he was and he's the one who's butt was kicked? Shamrock actually used to be pretty impressive. But those days are long behind him.
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jul 31, 2006 18:01:54 GMT -5
Tito is too young and too fast for Shamrock.
|
|
|
Post by Stinger on Aug 13, 2006 0:22:16 GMT -5
I thought I heard during a commerical recently that this Wednesday they're going to show the match on TV between Forrest Griffin vs. Tito Ortiz that aired on pay-per-view.
|
|
|
Post by DEAD GPK on Aug 18, 2006 12:46:12 GMT -5
i never miss a payperview. they run about fourty bucks but still is cheaper than a wrestling or boxing payperview which run fifty to almost sixty dollars. as far as the second tito/shamrock, tito put the hurt on shamrock. it lasted so short because shamrock wasnt ready like he thought he was. its was a just call for a tko. tko is called when a fighter cannot intelligently defend him self. and well basicly shamrock took about five elbows to the face on his back with out so much as putting a hand up. i have really never been disapointed by a payperview because in all you watch about 6 to eight fights sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by SiMpLe-SiStEr on Aug 27, 2006 21:22:54 GMT -5
Man! Did anyone watch UFC the other night with that white guy and black guy going at it and the white guy had his forehead split open, bleeding all over the ring and on the other guy? The officials ran that fight thru all 3 rounds with that guy pouring blood out. That match should've been called. Then, they turn around and give the guy bleeding everywhere the win. I think the other guy should've won. The one who was bled on.
|
|