|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 13, 2006 21:47:33 GMT -5
Michael was shot directly above the eye's under the eyebrows. His eye balls can clearly be seen intact in the screen cap. Blood was gushing over his eye's that's why he was taking blind swipes at Laurie. The arrows indicate where the bullets entered his skull. 
|
|
|
|
Post by Colt .45 on Jan 13, 2006 22:00:49 GMT -5
Thats a nice picture tommy   i dont like how hes not burned in part 5 the unmasking scene. |
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 13, 2006 22:14:07 GMT -5
Dude Part 5 has got to be the worst movie in Horror History!
Or at least the top 5 worst!
|
|
|
|
Post by jason3chick on Jan 13, 2006 22:32:29 GMT -5
He is burned. You just never really saw it because of the camera angle. Now we're even Tommy. You like JTM, and I liked part 5.
|
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 13, 2006 22:35:42 GMT -5
Oh wow I'm sorry for publicly dissing it then. I wont no more. 
|
|
|
|
Post by jason3chick on Jan 22, 2006 20:42:10 GMT -5
Oh that is okay. I was just messing with you |
|
|
|
Post by Scanjet on Jan 23, 2006 13:49:34 GMT -5
He was also set on fire and he survived. If you look in the on H20, you see a person in Michael's eye so they did not do their homework did they...
|
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 23, 2006 19:20:07 GMT -5
If you look in the on H20, you see a person in Michael's eye so they did not do their homework did they... |
|
|
|
Post by The HangMan on Jan 24, 2006 11:29:14 GMT -5
SO WHY DID HE BLEED FROM THE EYES ?
|
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 24, 2006 17:14:37 GMT -5
He must have been shot in the eye brow area.
|
|
|
|
Post by The HangMan on Jan 24, 2006 18:22:17 GMT -5
But would that in fact not blind you the bone shater an all
|
|
Death
Checked into Bates Motel
Posts: 34
|
Post by Death on Jan 29, 2006 18:33:21 GMT -5
Doesn't Michael regenerate like Jason does?
|
|
|
|
Post by Voorhees666 on Jan 29, 2006 18:43:07 GMT -5
No, Michael does not *at least that we know of*, Tommy what you're suggesting is that instead of getting shot in the eyes, he got shot in the brain.  I don't care if people say he's the evil incarnate or whatnot, if what you're saying is true, then he should've been dead. |
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 29, 2006 19:06:50 GMT -5
Hell he should have been dead after getting shot in the heart... so what's the diff lol
If he was shot in the eye's he would have been shot in the brain as well at that angle ;D
So there's no real thing to explain why he is alive... I'm just saying I did a close up and saw he wasn't shot in the eye's 
|
|
|
|
Post by Voorhees666 on Jan 29, 2006 19:12:08 GMT -5
And this is what we call a goof!  No, seriously though, but you're right he should've been dead after Loomis shot him off the balcony in the original Halloween. |
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 29, 2006 19:13:28 GMT -5
That's horror sequals for ya.... always has been like that always will be. 
|
|
Death
Checked into Bates Motel
Posts: 34
|
Post by Death on Jan 29, 2006 19:21:39 GMT -5
Well he has been shot, stabbed, burned ect ect.... It's obvious he is like Jason and can take alot of punishment (not near as much as Jason) and possibly does regenerate.
|
|
|
|
Post by Voorhees666 on Jan 29, 2006 19:47:31 GMT -5
That's horror sequals for ya.... always has been like that always will be. Bah, continuity is overrated! And Death, he could, possibly, the non-Thorn timeline has never really delved into how he can't die. I want a better explanation than he's the evil incarnate! |
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 29, 2006 19:51:28 GMT -5
I guess there really is no explanation... I will make a thread about this. thanks for the idea!
|
|
