|
Post by d3M0n on Jun 15, 2008 8:43:00 GMT -5
I saw this movie last night. I have mixed feelings. For one it's 200 times better then the piece of shit they made a few years ago.
As for this movie, I thought the Hulk didn't look real in many scenes like he did in the other one they made. I thought the action was great. Amazing fight at the end!
However just like the first one I think they had a little too much army stuff in this. I know nothing about the comic book so I gotta ask... whats with all the army shit? Why is the army always after him? Must there be an army in every Hulk movie? Whats the point?
Norton did an amazing job in this movie! Cant wait till the one where Hulk and Iron man are together.
I rate this movie a 4 due to too much army shit.
|
|
|
Post by The Darkness on Jun 15, 2008 8:52:06 GMT -5
I still have to see it, but from what Predator and you say, it looks good.
There are supervillains in the Hulk comics, like Armageddon and Boomerang, but, like Iron Man, they're going slow with the supervillains. Each upcoming Marvel film will have two sequels and become trilagies, and these trilagies will lead up to an Avengers movie.
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jun 15, 2008 9:12:08 GMT -5
There is so much Army due to how the comic goes. For the first several years of his existence The Hulk was chased by the Army. In the comics Bruce Banner became the Hulk when he was testing a Gamma Bomb in the New Mexico desert. He went out to save Rick Jones who had driven on to the test site and the bomb went off. The Gamma radiation is what transformed him. General Ross and Betty were both present. For a fair amount of time no one but Rick Jones knew the Hulk was Banner. So Ross thought he was just fighting a dangerous enemy. So it makes sense that we'd see a lot of Army in the first movies. I rate it a 5. I loved it.
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jun 15, 2008 10:16:29 GMT -5
Is Mr. Blue a future villain? Why was his head bubbling like that?
I guess it does make sense to have so much army crap then. It was still great either way.
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jun 15, 2008 12:33:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Chainsaw on Jun 15, 2008 13:10:42 GMT -5
I only want to see it because Norton is the man. Other than that, I don't like how it has to be CGI and huge, but that's the times I guess.
I will wait for the rent on it.
|
|
|
Post by jlaw on Jun 15, 2008 21:30:31 GMT -5
I haven't seen this one. I'm not really a Hulk fan, but I didn't think the one in 2003 was bad as it was made out to be....but that could be my deep affection for Jennifer Connelly blinding me.
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jun 16, 2008 5:03:39 GMT -5
but that could be my deep affection for Jennifer Connelly blinding me. must be ;D
|
|
|
Post by Kwik Kash on Jun 16, 2008 15:32:18 GMT -5
This movie wasn't too bad. It has it's pros and cons, as did the previous one.
I'm really curious to see how they'll work towards the Avengers movie, that could be an incredible film.
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jun 16, 2008 17:19:36 GMT -5
What about this one? What do you rate it?
|
|
|
Post by Kwik Kash on Jun 16, 2008 17:23:03 GMT -5
I gave it a 3. To me, it just felt like an upgraded version of the previous film.
|
|
|
Post by JasonKrueger13 on Jun 16, 2008 21:44:29 GMT -5
I enjoyed this, the first 2 marvel studio films are great, they are becoming my favorite movie studio.
I don't know if this will be considered SPOILERS because it was in a trailer, but I loved Tony Stark's time in this! Can't wait for the avengers 2011.
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jun 17, 2008 1:19:19 GMT -5
I'm looking forward to the Captain America and Thor movies coming out between now and The Avengers.
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jun 17, 2008 5:06:12 GMT -5
I'll probably be dead by 2011...
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jun 17, 2008 6:30:23 GMT -5
LOL you'll only be 31. Unless you have some serious disease going on right now I think you'll still be around.
|
|
|
Post by Stinger on Jul 1, 2008 1:18:39 GMT -5
I give this one a five. I like the other one but rate it a 3 or 4 since the ending was bad.
|
|