|
|
Post by Xч on Sept 29, 2008 16:17:20 GMT -5
 This film is definitely not for faint-of-heart prudes. Bill Zebub loads his semi-experimental take on the Frankenstein story with rape scenes even more graphic than those in his cult hit Jesus Christ: Serial Rapist and throws in heaps of blood and near-constant breast exposure as well. This is an utterly shameless sexploitative gorefest, but if you're one of those people who's always looking for the most f*cked-up thing they can find, then you better buy it up quick before we run out. Oh and one another thing, that black dot on the girl's nipple on the box cover, it won't be there when the DVD comes. Limited edition.Frankenstein the rapist is the only Bill zebub film i own,i'm not interested in any of his other films because it deals with Jesus christ desecration mess.I don't dig those kind of films.
But this alternate version of Frank was pretty cool,Plus I've never seen a dvd cover art work look so graphic!
3 REASONS TO BUY THIS FILM
* The title alone says it all.
* Bill Zebub always manages to get girls way too hot for his budget to get totally naked...
* and do things on camera that you didn't even know people did off camera |
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Sept 29, 2008 16:25:59 GMT -5
I like the story of Frankensteins Monster too much to watch something like this.
I don't understand. Why would you like something like this XN? It's disgusting to insult a good story like Frankenstein with Rape.
I'm even more surprised you'd support some one who made a movie about Jesus being a serial rapist. I know you don't own that movie. But it was the same guy doing both films right?
I'm not even Christian and the idea someone would make a film like that is repulsive to me. I definitely wouldn't support that person financially by buying another one of their films.
I'm not judging you. I just wonder how you can be o.k. with this Zebub guy? He sounds like a sick degenerate.
I also don't like how they try to insult a person into buying it. I'm not a prude by any means. I just don't think Rape films using characters I like is in very good taste.
|
|
|
|
Post by Xч on Sept 29, 2008 17:44:58 GMT -5
I consider myself a historian of the genre.That means kyle,that i buy lots of films that deal with horror (no matter how grotesque it may be).I might be the only one on this forum who does this yes but i did not offend anybody here.
The orange text in the films description is not my own-i didn't write it.
Thanks for sharing your opinion on my taste.As far as Zebub goes i don't support all his films,I just brought the Frankenstein one out of curiosity.Its just a movie,and i don't take it seriously.
You said you're not judging me-so why respond the way you did?
I guess i should just take my bad taste where people could understand it better then ;D
The deadpit forum seems welcoming to it .(my taste that is)
|
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Sept 29, 2008 17:55:01 GMT -5
I know you didn't write the words in orange. I said I didn't like how they use the insulting technique in order to try and convince a person to buy it.
If you like this kind of film that's great. I was just wondering how you could support Zebub being that you are Christian. If it's because of a historian thing. Then I guess I can understand why you'd buy it.
I wasn't saying you can't enjoy this film or commenting on your taste. I just thought it was odd that you know he did that Jesus rape film and bought another film by him.
You know we are allowed to disagree about movies on CLAD. It's not that big of deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Xч on Sept 29, 2008 18:24:58 GMT -5
I don't support Zebub kyle.
The guy is a satanist
I really find his Jesus films insulting,because i am christian.
Thats the only line i will never cross when it comes to horror.
Just the cover art on his Jesus film is disgusting to me.I never saw any of it.
I Just purchased the Frankenstein film out of curiosity (I'm not going to buy anymore of his films).I really appreciate your concern though Kyle.Shows how you really care about people and their well being.
I just enjoy horror art and movies.I know rape films isn't your cup of tea and of course This Frankenstein film isn't the best horror movie i ever seen.But its worth talking about thats for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Sept 29, 2008 18:33:47 GMT -5
Exactly. I was just checking your reasoning. I didn't mean it in an insulting way. Him being a Satanist makes sense. It would take a Jesus hater to come up with the rapist thing.  He's lucky we're in America where being so insulting about others religions is allowed. If he tried making a Muhhomed rapist movie in the Middle East he'd be put to death. LOL |
|
|
|
Post by Xч on Sept 29, 2008 18:41:56 GMT -5
oh yeah in a heart beat.Nobody should insult one's religion,whatever that may be.
I'm not sure if you're a Cronenberg fan,but there's another film i'd like to talk about.
Rabid
Made in 1977
That film also has some rape scenes in it.
But let me ask you-have you ever seen any 70's horror film without explicit sex?I haven't.
After work i'll post details on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leatherface on Sept 29, 2008 18:45:16 GMT -5
so let me get this straight. this guy mad e amovie about the monster from Frankenstein raping women. i've herad of some crazy films before but wow
|
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Sept 29, 2008 19:06:09 GMT -5
oh yeah in a heart beat.Nobody should insult one's religion,whatever that may be.
I'm not sure if you're a Cronenberg fan,but there's another film i'd like to talk about.
Rabid
Made in 1977
That film also has some rape scenes in it.
But let me ask you-have you ever seen any 70's horror film without explicit sex?I haven't.
After work i'll post details on it. Is that the one where the woman gets a treatment that makes her a Vampire like creature? That was twisted. Good movie though. I don't mind a rape in a film if it isn't a central theme. If it's literally a exploitation film that is rape after rape just for shock. Maybe I'm afraid of getting desensitized to rape. Like I have to killing in movies? I was raped/molested as a child. So maybe I'm just more sensitive about it than I should be. LOL |
|
|
|
Post by Leatherface on Sept 29, 2008 19:21:16 GMT -5
i think i saw that once at my local video store. they said they were getting rid of it though
|
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Sept 29, 2008 19:33:39 GMT -5
They'd never allow a film like this in our video stores. The Mormons don't allow things they find too shocking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leatherface on Sept 29, 2008 19:51:45 GMT -5
i think that's kinda why they were getting rid of it. apprently it offeneded one of it's most valuable customers or somethin
|
|
|
|
Post by Xч on Oct 2, 2008 7:12:38 GMT -5
Yeah,its a disgusting film.I do apologize if this film offended anyone on the forum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Oct 2, 2008 10:43:18 GMT -5
I wasn't offended. Just curious.
Like I've said before I was just surprised you'd buy a movie from a guy who did a movie insulting to Jesus. I now understand your reasoning.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chainsaw on Oct 2, 2008 20:38:49 GMT -5
I'm staying away from the whole religeous and freedom of speech conversations but I just don't think this movie would do it for me.
I do respect everyones opinions here though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Xч on Oct 5, 2008 19:47:53 GMT -5
Just to get something clear.The film never really shows Frankenstein at all.Just a cheap looking hand that you can find in stores during Halloween for 13 bucks.
You never see whats really happening during the sex scenes,its not explicit.All you see is the girl moving up and down and screaming.
Before the rape scene we see the victim running completely naked in slow motion,with lots of close up shots.
This film is basically just a playboy video with blood.
|
|
