|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jan 17, 2009 14:22:10 GMT -5
Tom Atkins is the only reason I really want to see this. In fact I had no interest in the film until it was announced he'd be in it. From every review I've read so far he seems to be the bright point. It's odd how often horror movies are made like that. I can't count how many movies are made watchable due to a real star being part of them. Some of Bela Lugosi's films would be completely unenjoyable without him being part of them.
|
|
|
Post by Xч on Jan 17, 2009 22:59:31 GMT -5
Kyle i would say go ahead and see the film,but i just don't want you to get disappointed.
I paid over 25 dollars for just 2 people,they charge for the 3d glasses. Plus i paid more money for popcorn and soda.
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jan 17, 2009 23:06:21 GMT -5
I'm hoping someone shares the 2D version online.
|
|
|
Post by Xч on Jan 18, 2009 8:55:27 GMT -5
Give it a week or 2. I'm pretty sure someone will.
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 18, 2009 9:05:42 GMT -5
I paid over 25 dollars for just 2 people,they charge for the 3d glasses. Plus i paid more money for popcorn and soda. That's an absolute steal! If I bought popcorn, soda, tickets and 3-d glasses in NJ I'd be looking at 30 minimum. You got it easy in LA man. A buck is worth about 74cents here and 98cents in LA.
Anyway I only wanna see this for Atkins and the 15 mins of full frontal. Other then that I have no interest. I will also watch it online.
|
|
|
Post by Xч on Jan 18, 2009 9:10:22 GMT -5
The hole night cost 25 dollars for the tickets plus 2 sodas 5.15 each and a large popcorn..8.00 dollars.
Total 43 dollars and change.. Its about the same.
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 18, 2009 9:13:43 GMT -5
Oh I was just adding it up as if I shared a soda and popcorn. Your amount was so low at 56 that I thought thats what you did.
You paid $15 per ticket? I never heard of that!
|
|
|
Post by Xч on Jan 18, 2009 9:15:55 GMT -5
You gonna love the naked chick man!That was the best scene in the whole movie. She ran all over the place naked. Beautiful ass too. With heels..man i love girls with pretty feet.
Yup they charged for the 3d glasses.
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 18, 2009 9:49:55 GMT -5
Yea that's why Im not paying to see her naked either. To be honest I never go to the movies unless it's something a hot chick I wanna bang wants to do that night. Or unless it's a BIG movie. Like 50% of comic book movies or major horror franchises. Other then that I wait for the DVD to rent it.
|
|
|
Post by Xч on Jan 18, 2009 10:49:42 GMT -5
Same here guys,the only reason i went to see MBV was for the 3d,and that really sucked IMO.I could wait to see gore and tits on dvd,unless its a real big movie like the friday remake or anything major.
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jan 18, 2009 22:47:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jan 18, 2009 22:56:16 GMT -5
I can't count how many times I've rated films completely opposite to what the norm was on that site. Some movies that have extremely low ratings I think are incredible and vice versa. But then again I don't base my opinion on what's popular. I go by what I enjoy. LOL It does make me wonder why it's been rated so high though. Maybe the 30 minute tit shot. ;D
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 18, 2009 23:02:38 GMT -5
I'm still not going to pay 15 dollars to watch a good movie.
|
|
|
Post by Zombified Jeremy on Jan 19, 2009 7:01:01 GMT -5
I can't count how many times I've rated films completely opposite to what the norm was on that site. Some movies that have extremely low ratings I think are incredible and vice versa. But then again I don't base my opinion on what's popular. I go by what I enjoy. LOL It does make me wonder why it's been rated so high though. Maybe the 30 minute tit shot. ;D The consensus opinion is that the people who made it knew not to take the film too seriously, and it works for that reason.
|
|
|
Post by Boggman! on Jan 19, 2009 13:54:40 GMT -5
I thought the movie was excellent! And I also thought the 3d was VERY impressive. There was nothing wrong with it at all. The depth of field was amazing and the movie has just the right amount things coming off screen and at you as well. I am not a fan of the original movie at all - so I strongly feel that the remake was 1000X times better. The movie delivered on all levels and has one of the greatest 10 minute nude sequences that I have ever seen in a horror movie. The audience really had a blast (and so did I) And to answer your question Kyle- the glasses will fit over prescription lenses - as my wife actually wore her glasses under the 3D ones that were provided. I also kept an extra set Tickets were pretty expensive. I paid $14 a ticket but felt that it was well worth it! Tom Atkins was great and in fine form! There was a death scene associated with his charcter that was simply off the hook!
|
|
|
Post by terridawn on Jan 20, 2009 0:05:40 GMT -5
Thanks Boggman! I was hoping this movie would turn out to be good. I also thank you for letting me know the 3-D glasses will fit over my prescription glasses.
What I cannot believe is theatres charging for the 3-D glasses. When I saw FRIDAY THE 13th Part 3 in 3-D back in 1983, I did not pay for the 3-D glasses. Are all theatres charging or only some?
|
|
|
Post by Xч on Jan 20, 2009 15:52:40 GMT -5
I think all the theaters are capitalizing on the shitty 3d.
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jan 20, 2009 15:55:44 GMT -5
I can't believe how much positive buzz it's getting.
|
|
|
Post by d3M0n on Jan 20, 2009 16:34:15 GMT -5
Know where we can watch it Kyle?
|
|
|
Post by Drayton Sawyer on Jan 20, 2009 16:38:12 GMT -5
Not yet. When I find a copy online (if I do ;D) I'll post the link.
|
|